Practitioner Reports
Important Dates
Summary submission (optional but recommended): |
September 7, 2004 |
Report submission: |
October 25, 2004 |
Notification of acceptance: |
December 6, 2004 |
Final revision due: |
January 17, 2005 |
Overview
With AOSD gaining popularity, many potential new users are somewhat cautious
about adoption. As the basic understanding of AOP improves among developers,
perhaps the most common question asked is "who is using it, and how it has
worked for them?" Practitioner reports at AOSD.05 provide a platform to answer
these questions.
Practitioner reports provide an opportunity for the industry leaders in applying
AOSD to share their experiences with the community and for the community to
learn lessons to guide their adoption. AOSD.05 attendees will want an
objective analysis of AOSD applications in real life. What kinds of problems
have you tackled with AOSD? Did it meet your expectations? What issues did you
face? How did your colleagues who weren’t familiar with AOSD respond? Did you
uncover any patterns, anti-patterns, and best practices?
With the increased focus on industry participation in AOSD.05, practitioner
reports will form an important part of the conference. This year we are
encouraging new participants to submit a summary of their experience, so they
can receive early feedback and support in producing a good practitioner’s
report.
Submission Guidelines
Practitioner reports should be submitted to practitionersaosd.net. A
practitioner feedback committee (separate from the program committee) will
evaluate the submissions. The review process may require a phone interview to
understand the report better and help the authors improve it to better meet
participant expectations. Therefore, your submission must name a primary contact
including postal address, telephone and fax numbers, and email address.
We encourage interested practitioners to take advantage of the summary
submission deadline to get early feedback. This option allows submitters to
describe an application of AOSD, and to get assistance in what to emphasize and
in structuring and writing an experience report about it.
Authors of accepted papers will present a 30 minute presentation at the AOSD
conference. The audience will include experts from both industry and academia.
Accepted submissions will also be posted on aosd.net.
Practitioner reports should be 3-10 pages in length, including an abstract not
to exceed 300 words. The authors’ names, affiliations and e-mail addresses must
be clearly stated on the first page.
A references section should list all publications that have been referenced in
the report, and references should be complete and consistent in style. It is not
a requirement to follow the technical paper submission guidelines, though you
may do so if convenient. A single column layout is acceptable if this better
suits your material. The ICSE 2003 conference site provided
quality criteria and guidelines for experience reports
which you may find helpful in preparing your
submission. With thanks to the ICSE 2003 Experience Reports Committee, a subset
of those guidelines is reproduced here for convenience:
Structure and content of report
The structure and content of a good experience report is characterized as
follows.
- The introduction
- presents the background and the context of the contribution
- makes clear which roles the authors of the contribution play in the work that is being reported
- summarizes results and insight in a few sentences
- gives an overview of the structure of the paper
- The main sections
- of a "classic" experience report describe the approach and its results in terms of the methods, techniques, languages, tools, processes, prerequisites, problems, and people involved, as appropriate
- of a case study describe a product and give rationale for the key decisions shaping the product
- The conclusion
- evaluates the results and derives experience and insight that is valuable for the intended audience of the paper
- reports both positive and negative observations (nothing is perfect!)
- discusses limitations and the range of applicability
- refers to related experience by others and discusses it (if such experience exists and if this has not been discussed in the introduction)
- summarizes the state of work and sketches future work (if applicable)
- The references
- list all publications that have been referenced in the paper are complete and consistent in style
Contact
For additional information, clarifications, or questions please contact the AOSD.05
Industrial Chairs: Ron Bodkin and Ramnivas Laddad
(practitionersaosd.net).
Edited by the AOSD Conference Committee. Send comments to: webmasteraosd.net
|